Search for the basic unit of organizationalcommunication

Authors

  • Gergely Németh Budapesti Metropolitan Egyetem Author
  • Kata Illés Miskolci Egyetem Author
  • Béla Gerlei Budapesti Metropolitan Egyetem Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14513/tge-jres.00403

Keywords:

Leader–Member Exchange (LMX), Leader–member communication, organization effectiveness, units of communication, managerial tasks

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the basic units of the communication transaction appearing in the manager–subordinate relationship and their characteristics, and to designate research targets.
The authors also carried out a non–formal, non–systematic (research criteria was not built and comprehensiveness was not the goal) literature review in order to define the topic more precisely.
Research questions were defined by using the Grounded Theory (GT) theory–building methodology, which were derived from the data of literature research and field work. The main motivation was the failure to find satisfactory answers on how interactive manager–employee communication can be implemented and with what content in order to increase the efficiency of managerial
work. The study offers research questions and objectives that need to be further investigated in order to identify behavioral and specific transactional elements for achieving performance in the relationship between manager and subordinate.

References

Anand, S.–Hu, J.–Vidyarthi, P.–Liden, R. C. (2018) Leader–member exchange as a linking pin in the idiosyncratic deals–Performance relationship in workgroups. The leadership quarterly, 29, 6, pp. 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.005

Aronson, E.–Aronson, J. (2018) The social animal. Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning.

Avolio, B. J.–Bass, B. M. (2002) Developing potential across a full range of Leadership Tm: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Lawrence Elbaum Associate

Bales, R. F.–Slater, P. E. (1955) (szerk.) Role differentiation in small decision–making groups. In Bales, R. F.–Parsons, T. (Eds.): Family, socialization and interaction process. Routledge. pp. 259–306.

Bass, B. M.–Bass, R. (2008) The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.

Bauer, T. N.–Erdogan, B. (2015) Leader–member exchange (LMX) theory: An introduction and overview. In Bauer, T. N.–Erdogan, B. (Eds.): Oxford handbook of leader–member exchange. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–9.

Bennedsen, M.–Nielsen, K. M.–Pérez–González, F.–Wolfenzon, D. (2007) Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 2, pp. 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.647

Bertrand, M.–Schoar, A. (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118, 4, pp. 1169–1208. https://doi. org/10.1162/003355303322552775

Bloom, N.–Sadun, R.–Van Reenen, J. (2016) Management as a Technology? (No. w22327) National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22327

Bloom, N.–Van Reenen, J. (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of economic perspectives, 24, 1, pp. 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1257/ jep.24.1.203

Borgatti, S. P.–Mehra, A.–Brass, D. J.–Labianca, G. (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 5916, pp. 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821

Camm, J. D.–Cochran, J. J.–Fry, M. J.–Ohlmann, J. W.–Anderson, D. R. (2022) An introduction to management science: quantitative approaches to decision making. Cengage Learning.

Cross, R. L.–Cross, R. L.–Parker, A. (2004) The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Harvard Business Press.

Dalal, R. S. (2005) A meta–analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 90, 6, p. 1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1241

Dansereau Jr. F.–Graen, G.–Haga, W. J. (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13, 1, pp. 46–78. https://doi. org/10.1016/0030–5073(75)90005–7

Dekas, K. H.–Bauer, T. N.–Welle, B.–Kurkoski, J.–Sullivan, S. (2013) Organizational citizenship behavior, version 2.0: A review and qualitative investigation of OCBs for knowledge workers at Google and beyond. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 3, pp. 219–237. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0097

DeNisi, A. S.–Williams, K. J. (1988) Cognitive approaches to performance appraisal. Research in personnel and human resources management, 6, pp. 109–155.

Dienesch, R. M.–Liden, R. C. (1986) Leader–member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 11, 3, pp. 618–634. ttps:// doi.org/10.2307/258314

Drucker, P. (2006) The effective executive. Harper Essential.

Van Dyne, L.–Kamdar, D.–Joireman, J. (2008) In–role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of applied psychology, 93, 6, p. 1195. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.93.6.1195

Fiedler, F. E. (1964) A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in experimental social psychology, 1, pp. 149–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065–2601(08)60051–9

Fiedler, F. E. (1967) A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw–Hill.

Fiedler, F. E. (1978) The Contingency Model and the Dynamics of the Leadership Process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, pp. 59–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065– 2601(08)60005–2

Fiedler, F. E. (2015) Contingency theory of leadership. In Robbins, S. P.–Judge, T. A. (Eds.): Organizational Behavior 1. Routledge. pp. 232–255.

Feldman, D. C. (1981) The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of management review, 6, 2, pp. 309–318. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4287859

French, J. R.–Raven, B.–Cartwright, D. (1959) The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 7, pp. 311–320.

Gerstner, C. R.–Day, D. V. (1997) Meta–Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82, 6, p. 827.

van Gils, S.–van Quaquebeke, N.–van Knippenberg, D. (2010) The X–factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 19, 3, pp. 333–363. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13594320902978458

Goffman, E (1999) Az én bemutatása a mindennapi életben. Thalassa Alapítvány, Pólya Kiadó, Budapest.

Graen, G. B.–Uhl–Bien, M. (1995) Relationship–based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi– level multi–domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6, 2, pp. 219–247. https://doi. org/10.1016/1048–9843(95)90036–5

Gubányi, M. (2020) A pszichológiai szerződés szakirodalmi összefoglalója. Vezetéstudomány, 51, 10, pp. 40–50. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2020.10.04

Hackett, R. D.–Farh, J. L.–Song, L. J.–Lapierre, L. M. (2003) LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the links within and across Western and Chinese samples. Dealing with diversity, 1, pp. 219–231.

Hersey, P.–Blanchard, K. H. (1969) Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal, 23, 5, pp. 26–34.

Ilies, R.–Nahrgang, J. D.–Morgeson, F. P. (2007) Leader–member exchange and

citizenship behaviors: A meta–analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92, 1, p. 269. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021–9010.92.1.269

Judge, T. A.–Piccolo, R. F.–Ilies, R. (2004) The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of applied psychology, 89, 1, p. 36. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.89.1.36

Kacmar, K. M.–Witt, L. A.–Zivnuska, S.–Gully, S. M. (2003) The interactive effect of leader– member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of applied psychology, 88, 4, 764. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.88.4.764

Katz, D.–Kahn, R. (1978) (szerk.) The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New York.

Kotter, J. P. (2003) What leaders really do. In Hoper, A. (Ed.): Leadership perspectives. Routledge. pp. 7–15.

Kranz, J.–Gilmore, T. N. (1990) The splitting of leadership and management as social defence. Human Relations, 43, 2, pp. 183–204.

Kuvaas, B.–Buch, R.–Dysvik, A.–Haerem, T. (2012) Economic and social leader–member exchange relationships and follower performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 5, pp. 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.013

Leary, M. R.–Baumeister, R. F. (2000) The nature and function of self–esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in experimental social psychology, 32, pp. 1–62.

Leavitt, K.–Reynolds, S. J.–Barnes, C. M.–Schilpzand, P.–Hannah, S. T. (2012) Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 6, pp. 1316–1333. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.1023

Lee, A.–Thomas, G.–Martin, R.–Guillaume, Y.–Marstand, A. F. (2019) Beyond relationship quality: The role of leader–member exchange importance in leader–follower dyads. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 4, pp. 736–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/ joop.12262

Liden, R. C.–Graen, G. (1980) Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management journal, 23, 3, pp. 451–465. https://doi.org/10.5465/255511 • Liden, R. C.–Maslyn, J. M. (1998) Multidimensionality of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of management, 24, 1, pp. 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400105

Liden, R. C.–Sparrowe, R. T.–Wayne, S. J. (1997) Leader–member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, pp. 47–119.

Linton, R. (1945) The cultural background of personality. Appleton–Century.

Marschak, J. (1955) Elements for a theory of teams. Management science, 1, 2, pp. 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1.2.127

Marshall, D. A. (2002) Behavior, belonging, and belief: A theory of ritual practice. Sociological theory, 20, 3, pp. 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9558.00168

Martin, R.–Guillaume, Y.–Thomas, G.–Lee, A.–Epitropaki, O. (2016) Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel psychology, 69, 1, pp. 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100

McGrath, J. E. (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

McGrath, J. E. (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) A Theory of Groups. Small group research, 22, 2, pp. 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001

Merton, R. K. (1957) The role–set: Problems in sociological theory. The British journal of sociology, 8, 2, pp. 106–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/587363

Meyer, B.–Burtscher, M. J.–Jonas, K.–Feese, S.–Arnrich, B.–Tröster, G.–Schermuly, C. C. (2016) What good leaders actually do: micro–level leadership behaviour, leader evaluations, and team decision quality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 6, pp. 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1189903

Moreno, J. L. (1951) Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society.

Moreno, J. L. (1953) Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio–drama.

Németh, G. (2019) Entrepreneurs’ role. Taylor, 11, 1, pp. 35–45.

Németh, G. (2022) A vállalkozói lét illúziója. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Németh, G.–Magos, A (2018) People Analytics – organizational data for organizational efficiency. In Hoffer, I.–Tarjani, I (Eds.): Value Methodology and Management Magyar Értékelemzők Társasága, Budapest. pp. 281–295.

Németh G.–Gyulay T. (2003) A szervezeti kultúra szerepe egyesülési és felvásárlási folyamatokban. Vezetéstudomány, 34, 7–8, pp. 39–49.

Németh G. (2024) A szervezeti kultúra jelenségének és a vezetői magatartás szerepe a COVID–19 után a szervezetek menedzselésében. Észak–magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek. 21. Megjelenés alatt.

Northouse, P. G. (2021) Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.

Organ, D. W. (1977) A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction causes–performance hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2, pp. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amr.1977.4409162

Organ, D. W. (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington books/DC heath and com.

Poór, J.–Sanders, J. E.–Németh, G.–Varga, E. (2022) Management Consultancy in Central and Eastern Europe. Akadémiai kiadó, Budapest.

Robinson, S. L. (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative science quarterly, 41, 4, pp. 574–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393868

Rousseau, D. (1995) Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage publications.

Ruben, B. D.–Gigliotti, R. A. (2017) Communication: Sine qua non of organizational leadership theory and practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 54, 1, pp. 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675447

Settoon, R. P.–Bennett, N.–Liden, R. C. (1996) Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of applied psychology, 81, 3, p. 219. 10.1037/0021–9010.81.3.219

Sin, H. P.–Nahrgang, J. D.–Morgeson, F. P. (2009) Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 4, p. 1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014827

Stogdill, R. M. (1950) Leadership, membership and organization. Psychological bulletin, 47, 1, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053857

Tjosvold, D. (1984) Cooperation theory and organizations. Human relations, 37, 9, pp. 743–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700903

Vogel, S.–Schwabe, L. (2016) Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 1, 1, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11

Vroom, V. H.–Jago, A. G. (2007) The role of the situation in leadership. American psychologist, 62, 1, pp. 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.62.1.17

Walumbwa, F. O.–Mayer, D. M.–Wang, P.–Wang, H.–Workman, K.–Christensen, A. L. (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self–efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 115, 2, pp. 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002

Walumbwa, F. O.–Wang, P.–Wang, H.–Schaubroeck, J.–Avolio, B. J. (2010) Retracted: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors.

Watzlawick, P.–Bavelas, J. B.–Jackson, D. D. (2011) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. WW Norton & Company.

Wayne, S. J.–Shore, L. M.–Bommer, W. H.–Tetrick, L. E. (2002) The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp. 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.87.3.590

Yukl, G. (2008) How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The leadership quarterly, 19, 6, pp. 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.008

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Munkabizottsági magyar nyelvű tanulmányok

How to Cite

Németh, G., Illés, K., & Gerlei, B. (2024). Search for the basic unit of organizationalcommunication. Tér - Gazdaság - Ember Journal of Region, Economy and Society, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.14513/tge-jres.00403

Similar Articles

21-30 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.