Consumer Attitudes Towards Gender-based Pricing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14513/tge-jres.00432Keywords:
attitudes, consumer, gender, pricingAbstract
Purpose – This research examines the existence and extent of gender-based pricing inequalities within the Polish market, emphasizing consumer awareness and perceptions of equity. By merging an objective price analysis with subjective consumer assessments, the study provides a thorough understanding of how pricing differs between products aimed at men and women, and how these variations affect consumer attitudes and behaviors.
Design/methodology/approach – The study utilized a dual methodology. Initially, a comparative price analysis was performed for selected gender-specific products across categories such as personal care, clothing, toys and accessories. Pricing information was gathered from prominent Polish retail websites, comparing similar items for males and females in terms of unit price, functionality, and brand. Subsequently, a survey involving 155 consumers evaluated their awareness of these pricing disparities and their views on the fairness of such practices, as well as the influence on their purchasing choices.
Findings – The results indicate notable price discrepancies, with products targeted at women typically priced higher, despite offering comparable features to those aimed at men. Survey results reveal that a majority of consumers regard these price differences as unfair, which may result in alterations in purchasing behavior, including a willingness to explore products marketed towards the opposite gender to economize.
Originality – This study adds to limited literature on gender-based pricing in Poland by combining market data with consumer perspectives. The findings highlight the necessity for enhanced pricing transparency and lay the groundwork for additional academic inquiry and policy discussions regarding gender-based pricing practices.
References
Barnes, K., & Brounstein, J. (2022). The pink tax: Why do women pay more? Kilts Center at Chicago Booth Marketing Data Center Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4269217
Biercewicz, K., Włodarczyk, K., & Wiścicka-Fernando, M. (2024). Consumer emotions, purchasing decisions, shopping time, and paths in virtual reality. Human Technology, 20(2), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.8
Blythe, J. (2013). Consumer behavior (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Bochańczyk-Kupka, D. (2014). Luksus i dobra luksusowe. Studia Ekonomiczne, 176, 97–108.
Brough, A. R., & Isaac, M. S. (2022). Consumer awareness of gender-based pricing: The role of fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(2), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1254
Chua, A. B., Hidalgo, A., Huyo-a, J. J., & Santos, A. J. G. (2022). Pink power: The extent of awareness, driving factors, and overall perception of Filipina youth consumers in Metro Manila, Philippines on pink tax caused by pink marketing strategy. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 4(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2022.4.2.22
Cichocka-Bielicka, A. (2022, January 16). Nowy, niższy VAT na produkty apteczne. Jakie? Aptekarski.com. https://aptekarski.com/artykul/nowy-nizszy-vat-na-produkty-apteczne-jakie
Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: Differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(2), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13008
Courcoubetis, C., & Weber, R. (2003). Cost-based pricing. In S. Ross & R. Weber (Eds.), Pricing communication networks: Economics, technology and modelling (pp. 211–240). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470867175.ch7
Crawford, B. J. (2024). Pink tax and other tropes. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 34(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4052085
De Blasio, B., & Menin, J. (2015). From cradle to cane: The cost of being a female consumer: A study of gender pricing in New York City. The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs.
Downs, J., Norris, T., & Gomez, A. (2024, January 16). California’s pink tax law: How new gender-based pricing regulations impact businesses. Hogan Lovells. https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/californias-pink-tax-law-how-new-gender-based-pricing-regulations-impact-businesses
Essary, D. A. (2023). Hitting the wall: The next step in addressing the pink tax. Arkansas Law Review, 75(4), 901–940. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/alr/vol75/iss4/6
Fatah, S. M., & Khan, M. (2016). Online shopping attitudes of management students in India: An empirical exploration of genders. Pacific Business Review International, 8(7), 24–34.
Febriyanti, D., & Yuwono, W. (2023). Pink tax: As a form of gender identity in international products? Jambura Science of Management, 5(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.37479/jsm.v5i1.16908
Foong, E., & Gerber, E. M. (2021). Understanding gender differences in pricing strategies in online labor marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445636
Golik, J., & Wasilczuk, J. (2025). Feminist lens on gender roles in entrepreneurial intention and implementation. Gender, Work & Organization, 32(4), 1523–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13246
Grether, S. T. (2022). The pink tax. Feminist Pedagogy, 2(1), 2. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/feministpedagogy/vol2/iss1/2
Guittar, S. G., Grauerholz, L., Kidder, E. N., Daye, S. D., & McLaughlin, M. (2022). Beyond the pink tax: Gender-based pricing and differentiation of personal care products. Gender Issues, 39, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09280-9
Harb, O. (2022). The pink tax. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4311524
Hasan, B. (2010). Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.012
International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law. (2020). UnPinking discrimination: Exploring the pink tax and its implications. International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law, 1(3), 45–60.
Kapferer, J. (1997). Managing luxury brands. Journal of Brand Management, 4(4), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1997.4
Kaufman, S. M., Polack, C. F., & Campbell, G. A. (2018). The pink tax on transportation. In Women’s challenges in mobility (pp. 45–62). Rudin Center for Transportation.
Kern, T. (2023, January 16). Różowy podatek – dlaczego kobiety płacą więcej. FashionBiznes.pl. https://fashionbiznes.pl/rozowy-podatek-dlaczego-kobiety-placa-wiecej/
Kraft, H., & Weber, J. M. (2012). A look at gender differences and marketing implications. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21), 243–250.
Lafferty, M. (2019). The pink tax: The persistence of gender price disparity. Midwest Journal of Undergraduate Research, 11(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4030083
Lake, L. (2015). Consumer behavior for dummies. Wiley Publishing Inc.
Lukács, E., Völgyi, K., Filep, B., & Kovács, Z. (2020). A “Keleti nyitás” politika a magyar felsőoktatás és a Széchenyi István Egyetem nemzetköziesítésében. KÜLÜGYI SZEMLE, 19(1), 80–104.
Manko, B. A., & Jose, S. T. (2022). Gender-based shopping and consumer purchasing: “Sale ends today.” European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 7(4), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v7i4.1299
Meyers-Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015). Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003
Mortelmans, D. (2005). Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury. Semiotica, 157(1–4), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.497
Moshary, S., Tuchman, A., & Vajravelu, N. (2023). Gender-based pricing in consumer packaged goods: A pink tax? Marketing Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1452
Petersson McIntyre, M. (2018). Gender by design: Performativity and consumer packaging. Design and Culture, 10(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1516437
Németh, P., Torma, A., Lukács, E., & Filep, B. (2023). Sustainability Opportunities and Barriers at Universities, Development of a Sustainable University Environment. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 107, 505–510. http://doi.org/10.3303/CET23107085
Practical Law. (2020, January 16). New York implements "pink tax" ban prohibiting gender-based pricing for substantially similar goods and services. Thomson Reuters. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-028-2952
Rączka-Chodykin, A. (2024). „Podatek od bycia kobietą?”, czyli tak zwane podatki: różowy i od tamponów. Analiza porównawcza stanu faktycznego w Polsce i Stanach Zjednoczonych. Zoon Politikon, 15(15), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543408XZOP.24.001.19673
Sammut-Bonnici, T., & Channon, D. F. (2014). Pricing strategy. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of management (Vol. 12, pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120162
Safaya, S. (2014, April 11). AAFA backs legislation to overcome the ‘pink tax’ price discrepancy. JustStyle. https://www.just-style.com/news/aafa-backs-legislation-to-overcome-the-pink-tax-price-discrepancy/?cf-view
U.S. Congress. (2023). Pink Tax Repeal Act, H.R. 7828, 116th Cong. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7828
Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. The Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484–506. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540194
Wiedmann, P., Hennings, N., & Siebers, A. (2007). Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2007(7), 1–21.
Żuławiński, M. (2017, January 16). „Różowy podatek” to nie podatek. Bankier.pl. https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Rozowy-podatek-to-nie-podatek-7503205.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sandra Misiak-Kwit, Wiktoria Łunkiewicz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
